InstantForum.NET v4.1.4Vuzix Forumshttp://forums.vr920.com/forums@vuzix.us.comFri, 03 Sep 2010 07:42:12 GMT20http://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxI have this little issue....<br>Win 7 32, ATI HD card, Installed FS9 Deluxe + Acceleration (SP1, SP2)<br>Stereo and tracking works only the first time I run FS9 after installed vr920 libraries (VR920 monitor) if I exit the FS9 and run it again, it doesn´t work :(Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:08:43 GMTfruscellahttp://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxPoint 1) The VR920 is ALREADY compatable with FSX<P>Point 2) Put the VR920 with FSX on your Machine FSX will become a Slide Show!</P><DIV>(Irrelevant for this post Point 3) To have FSX smooth you have to make it look like the days of FS2000! Why bother? Might aswell just install FS2000 again. I have FS9 maxed out on everything, I get 45-56 frps!<BR></DIV><DIV>But Like you said were not here to discuss that :D</DIV><DIV> </DIV><DIV>Cheers</DIV><DIV> </DIV>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:08:18 GMTMBRANDhttp://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxI have both FS9 and FSX. My machine is a bit below yours Blave but I would rather spend the funds I do have on a Vusix 920 than upgrade my machine just for FSX. If FS9 gets supported I will buy a Vusix 920.Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:02:17 GMTHaveBluehttp://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxSorry, I disagree. I have a 3.4 gHz P4 with 2Gb, and an NVidia (EVGA) 7950GT card with 512Mb - not top of the line by any means. I haven't run FS9 since I got FS-X, other than for a couple payware add-ons that aren't (yet?) available in FS-X (and even for those, I think I've fired up FS9 maybe twice since FS-X came out). I am not saying my framerates are stellar, but they're nearly as or as good as what I was getting in FS9 when I turn the various settings down to what I was using in FS9.<br><br>Service Pack 1 is MANDATORY BTW. MS did some good stuff in that SP.<br><br><br>This goes without saying, but your mileage may differ tremendously from what I have experienced but I believe that if you know how to tweak the FS-X settings you can get completely acceptable framerates on your system as compared to what you get in FS9.<br><br>Note that I do not run AI traffic, and run little or no autogen scenery. Those two things are the biggest framerate killers in the sim. I admit that I do need a much faster system to be able to turn those on.<br><br>BTW this is a topic for endless debate and I'm not going to spend much (nay, probably any) more time here "discussing" it; I'm just saying that (after SP1) I have been able to settle down into an FS-X experience that is acceptable to me. <br><br>Avsim.com is a great place to go to get more tips/discussion about FS-X performance; this certainly ain't the place. My point in posting here is to cast a negative vote on developing drivers for FS9; I'd rather that Vuzix spend that time perfecting the FS-X ones.<br><br>Dave Blevins<br>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:56:00 GMTblavehttp://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxlol Techsupport "I do like hot cakes"Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:12:39 GMTwuhleihttp://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxAre they doing anything about it? Hope so.</P><DIV><P>I can't believe there is no response from the company about this! Do they not see the profit they would make if anything? </P><P>Everyone I know in the Flighsim community is still using FS9, there aren't computers built to handle FSX unless your NASA!! </P><P>Making these compatible with FS9 would earn Vuzix Thousands of Dollars $$$ </P><P>The term "Selling like Hot cakes" springs to mind</P><P>Complete Madness! </P></DIV>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:28:04 GMTMBRANDhttp://forums.vr920.com/Topic853-18-1.aspxPlease, please, please... Much faster frame rates than FSX. Many of us still love and support FS9Fri, 07 Dec 2007 02:10:24 GMTSwissX